dig txt resolver.dnscrypt.info This has been available for over 10 years, but the service is still alive and kicking. It now returns a bunch of additional details about the features the resolver supports. It also works with A/AAAA queries, but those only return the IP address. submitted by /u/jedisct1 [link] [comments] Powered by WPeMatico

Hi! Just dropped my first technical deep-dive on secure DNS infrastructure setup. Planning to document more of my home lab projects and real-world implementations. Would love to know if this type of content is useful for your work! https://rebootpending.blogspot.com/2025/08/dns-security-bind9-tutorial.html?m=1 submitted by /u/Deba_Dey1995 [link] [comments] Powered by WPeMatico

submitted by /u/Consistent_Agency937 [link] [comments] Powered by WPeMatico

New to the company and they use infoblox for DNS. They are trying to access a website: maono.com (chinese website for mics) So we cannot access the website UNLESS we use Google dns (8.8.8.8) or (1.1.1.1) and we get an internal error DNSSEC is not enable, already whitelisted the domain on PA (not the issue … Read More “Infoblox Issue: Not resolving URL” »

Hello all, I am trying to determine with accuracy whether or not the .ai TLD supports DNSSEC. Based on my research it’s murky and unclear. I can’t find anything definitive either way and what I do find seems to contradict other sources. From what I’ve seen, perhaps they do but maybe GoDaddy (our registrar and … Read More “Does the .ai TLD support DNSSEC?” »

submitted by /u/JadeLuxe [link] [comments] Powered by WPeMatico

My work internet doesn’t work it says can’t reach dns server IP address 192.168.167.110 Subnet mask 255.255.255.0 Gateway 192.168.167.2 Preferred Dns 8.8.8.8 Ipv6 is disabled I’ve tried to set it to DHCP but the internet didn’t work ? submitted by /u/AdEmbarrassed9106 [link] [comments] Powered by WPeMatico

I asked it to help me understand the exact role of DDNS and whether / how I can get a subdomain name to self host something for free. submitted by /u/ferriematthew [link] [comments] Powered by WPeMatico

The firewall has two uplinks, which translate currently in the following, usual, DNS record: 10 mx1.acme.org MX 100.10.1.1 20 mx2.acme.org MX 200.10.1.1 The problem is: the firewall does not allow us to have different certificates for different interfaces. So mx2 .acme.org replies with the certificate for mx1.acme.org, which causes issues. While another firewall is planned, … Read More “MX Round robin – a bad idea?” »

submitted by /u/dbcid [link] [comments] Powered by WPeMatico